Why computational models are better than verbal theories: the case of nonword repetition
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Trader Interoperability : Why Two Models Are Better than One
Up until now the accepted way of thinking on trader interoperability was to use a single interaction model called Federated Traders. That way of thinking is now being challenged. The preferred option emerging is two separate models: one for Distribution and one for Interworking. This separation is the result of the different requirements of distribution within the organization as opposed to the...
متن کاملVerbal autopsy coding: are multiple coders better than one?
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact on the reported cause-of-death patterns of a verbal autopsy coding strategy based on a review of every death by multiple coders versus a single coder. METHODS Deaths in 45 villages (total population 180,162) in southern India were documented during 12 months in 2003-2004, and a standard verbal autopsy questionnaire was completed for each death. Two physician cod...
متن کامل6 A computational model of nonword repetition , immediate serial recall , and nonword learning
A computational model is presented that tackles the issue of serial ordering both across word forms (as in list recall) and within word forms (as in nonword repetition). The model was set up to simulate performance in these two tasks. A number of patterns of relationship between performance in these tasks then fell out of the model, including the well-documented correlation between performance ...
متن کاملNonword Repetition Task
This report presents an analysis of speech productions obtained from 14 children with cochlear implants who completed a nonword repetition task. The stimuli consisted of 20 auditorily-presented multisyllabic nonwords. The analyses reported here include a descriptive analysis of the children’s errors, and a summary of how accurately the children imitated the duration, number of syllables, and in...
متن کاملNormative theories of argumentation: are some norms better than others?
Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal argumentation, as they do in studies of judgment, decisionmaking and reasoning more generally. Specifically, they guide a recurring theme: are people rational? Though rules and standards have been central to the study of reasoning, and behavior more generally, there has been little discussion with...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Developmental Science
سال: 2013
ISSN: 1363-755X
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12111